View Single Post
  #4  
Old February 19th 04, 07:08 AM
Kevin Brooks
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Pete" wrote in message
...

"Tarver Engineering" wrote in message
...

"Pete" wrote in message
...

"Tarver Engineering" wrote


Mach 2.3 was normal operating speed in the squadron I worked for.

Our
people believed the F-106 was aerodynamicly limited to that speed.

"normal operating speed"
Where was the normal AO?


Going mach 2.3 in an F-106 does not harm the airplane.

Going much faster than mach 2.3 is not an option in an intact F-106.


I don't question the -106 speed, but rather where they were doing it as

part
of "normal operations"


Question anything the Tarvernaut spouts. While some sources indicate a max
speed at altitude for the F-106 as being M2.3, the 319th FIS association's
website indicates it was actually a little bit below that (M2.25). And that
is the *max* speed--so his assertion that the F-106 normally operated at its
absolute max is crap. Now is about the time the Tarvernaut comes forth with
his, "Our F-106's were actually tasked to perform nuclear strike missions
with "optical nukes", and carried the AIM-7 Sparrow...", etc. All of which
is complete and utter hogwash, of course. But I suspect you may already know
this, and are just engaged in a bit of tail-twisting-of-the-Tarvernaut
here...

Brooks


Pete