View Single Post
  #107  
Old February 25th 04, 05:14 AM
John Keeney
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"puttster" wrote in message
om...
"John Carrier" wrote in message

...
Now if you want to argue that the F-35B is an aircraft designed as a

Carrier
Aircraft, I know some Marines that would like to chat with you. The B

will
be replacing AV-8B's and land based F-18's. Sure, it can land on a

carrier
but it is not being built to trap aboard CV/N's using arresting gear

or
Cat
launches.


True in a sense, but as a VSTOL and STOVL design, it's fully carrier
suitable w/o the need for catapult gear (I suspect it does have a

tailhook).
I'd also be much surprised if its CNI suite didn't include ACLS and

SPN-41
in their latest incarnations.

R / John



With an excellent V/STOL capability in the F-35B, why does the Navy
still demand those giant carriers? Seems like something can be done
there to make the whole system more efficient. Why design a plane
(the F-35C) to fit their ships?


Because the F-35C flies farther with a bigger load than the F-35B.
Because the ships aren't going away since they need the deck for
the E-2 and C-2 anyway.