Tom wrote:
On Sat, 8 Oct 2011 16:51:08 +0100, Keith Willshaw wrote:

..whether one agrees or not, David
Wilcock is far from being ignorant. Neither is Fulford.

Because you may disagree with them may mean kooky to you, that is
your choosing but ignorant they are not.

Do I assume correctly that you do not believe the essence of the
DUMB destruction/story?

Thats putting it mildly.

Put it bluntly then.

Its a crock of s**t dreamt up by conspirowhackos and believed
by imbeciles.

Be careful what you ask for - you just might get it.

Keith