On Sun, 9 Oct 2011 17:12:10 -0400, Canned Unicorn wrote:

On Sun, 9 Oct 2011 13:57:54 -0700 (PDT), David E. Powell wrote:

On Oct 9, 4:43*pm, Canned Unicorn
wrote:
On Sun, 9 Oct 2011 10:49:32 +0100, Keith Willshaw wrote:
Wait for the excuses, no proof is ever forthcoming. In the meantime,
I'm going to hunt me down some 12 year

snip

Keith

good god.

Yes, it is appaling, appaling how people who claim to seriously
advance a fantastic and fanciful story with zero evidence presented to
back it up go so quick to spoofing and post doctoring efforts that
were passe on Usenet 15 years ago. It is a wondrous comment on the
credibility of their other stories and a tremendous indication of
their level of professionalism.

IF you were forged which you were not why would it matter? Usenet
reputation?

*bahahahahaha*

There it is.

When your life is tied to your "appearance" on Usenet, the gloves come
off and the perversions ultimately show.