On Sun, 9 Oct 2011 13:54:44 -0700 (PDT), David E. Powell wrote:

Let's get the people who wrote the story. As they gave details about
the inside of the base surely they've been in there.

No they have made it very clear that their information is not onsite.
Read the article.

I did.

Telling.

My point being that unless there was an extreme radiation, biological
or chemical hazard, as the writer said there was not, even my
untrained self could go there with a camera and take some pictures.

You're a liar. No, that's too harsh - perhaps you're just a waffling
moron who can't remember from one minute to the next what he wrote. Let
me refresh your addled memory; I'll quote verbatim what you wrote:

"Let's get the people who wrote the story. As they gave details about
the inside of the base *surely they've been in there*"

Truth is simple. You moved the goalposts to cover either for the lie
that you read the article or the establishment that you fail to read
with the lowest level of comprehension.