On Oct 14, 9:46*am, vaughn wrote:
On Thu, 13 Oct 2011 15:40:38 -0700 (PDT), Eunometic wrote:
On Oct 14, 8:55*am, vaughn wrote:
On Thu, 13 Oct 2011 14:50:27 -0700 (PDT), Eunometic wrote:
On Oct 13, 11:33*pm, "vaughn" wrote:
"Eunometic" wrote in message

....

A civilian helicopter derived scout is essentially unable to protect
its crew or expensive sensor equipment from light arms impacts.

This is one of the more idiotic sweeping statement I've heard from Eno lately.
...and that's saying a lot!

Vaughn

How much armour is on the Kiowa Mr ****tard?
How much less than a purpose designed vehicle.

I'm not gracing your post with any comment, you cum guzzling troll.

Vaughn
Your welcome to eat my ****.

See. Nothing but a cum guzzler. *TROLL*

Vaughn- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Im the only person to have made a sensible comment on your post:

To white a commercially of the shelf light helicopter is a poor
substitute for the RAH-66 Commanche, especially in terms of crew
survivabillity (armour) and of course stealth: if this objects
purpose is to scout it should be fairly stealthy in terms of
accoustic, infrared and radar signature.