Thread
:
Why not use the F-22 to replace the F/A-18 and F-14?
View Single Post
#
128
February 26th 04, 12:31 AM
puttster
external usenet poster
Posts: n/a
Chad Irby wrote in message . com...
In article ,
(puttster) wrote:
Then let me ask why the Marines need the V/Stol capability. I cannot
get a good picture of a mission where the marines would need 400+ of
them with all the support for them but still not have a decent runway!
Why are you limiting the situation to needing 400+ at once?
The situation is more like "we need a dozen for this small brushfire war
in a place where there are no good airstrips," or we need to put a small
landing force in at this area, and the bad guys have a few planes, so we
need a little fighter cover from the LHDs."
If there are no good airstrips how would the marines get their gas,
bombs, food, and all the other support?
How (why?) were their Harriers used in Iraq?
To support Marine actions on the ground, without having to go through
the other services as much. They've been flying off of the USS Bonhomme
Richard.
Overall, Iraq hasn't been a good test of what we'd need the Harrier for.
Can anyone conjure a F-35B Marine job that could not be none by the
navy?
puttster