On Mon, 23 Jan 2012 17:25:02 -0800, Gunner Asch wrote:

On Mon, 23 Jan 2012 16:09:52 +0000 (UTC), bill
wrote:

On Mon, 23 Jan 2012 04:34:25 -0800, Gunner Asch wrote:

On Mon, 23 Jan 2012 08:51:36 +0000 (UTC), bill
wrote:

On Sun, 22 Jan 2012 15:09:37 -0800, Gunner Asch wrote:

On Sun, 22 Jan 2012 16:45:46 +0000 (UTC), bill
wrote:

On Sat, 21 Jan 2012 16:34:20 -0800, Gunner Asch wrote:

On Sat, 21 Jan 2012 17:06:50 +0000 (UTC), bill
wrote:

On Sat, 21 Jan 2012 01:20:29 -0800, Gunner Asch wrote:


First of all any story in the Sun needs to betaken with a very large
pinch of salt, and secondly any brief look at just about any UK
police web site will tell you that the H&K weapons are not capable
of fully automatic fire.

So they are simply large capacity assault weapons?

Can you define 'assault weapon' for me please?

As far as I'm a ware it's a US propaganda term for 'big scary black
gun'.

So the police
themselves are lying about carrying machine guns?

I very much doubt an policeman ever called these weapons 'machine
guns'.

I also doubt you or I would either.


Odd that I keep finding countless references to the British Police
carrying machine guns...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heckler_%26_Koch_G36

The British police use the special version, developed I understand for
an FBI requirement, for a self loading non fully automatic capable
version.

Except of course for the Fully Automatic 36C which I also posted links
to.


I noticed.

I don't for one moment imagine you have a primary sourcerather than athe
yellow press as a source do you?

Quite seriously I would like one because I could then make some quite
serious trouble for the 'met' when I get back.

But I imagine all you've actually got is a gutter journalist with a copy
of 'Small Arms of the World' and a blurry photograph.

--
William Black

Free men have open minds
If you want loyalty, buy a dog...