View Single Post
  #63  
Old March 7th 04, 10:02 AM
Buzzer
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Sun, 7 Mar 2004 01:51:49 -0500, "George Z. Bush"
wrote:

Snip/cut/slash/whack..

There are a lot articles about the Kerry speech, etc, but this one
seems to put it all together the best...

http://www.nationalreview.com/owens/...0401270825.asp

I don't think the claims he made were unsubstantiated, since they were all based
on sworn tesitimony of returned servicemen who had either participated in those
activities or had observed others doing those things. As for it being
widespread, I think that would be your characterization of it, not his. Show me
a transcript where he's quoted as saying that everybody was doing that sort of
stuff. I don't think one exists, but take a stab at it if you think it's worth
the effort.

....And why did he have that speechwriter draft his testimony?


I don't know why he would do that, if in fact he did. Perhaps he just wanted to
make sure that what he said would be accurate, and not colored by the emotional
strain of giving such testimony.

.......and with people who claim to be something that they are not. (Those
aren't all the same person in any of my statements.)

And there's another category of people whose names would fill our list and
who come from both sides of the aisle. Is there any point in pursuing that?

George Z.