View Single Post
  #21  
Old March 9th 04, 05:43 PM
D. Patterson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"George Z. Bush" wrote in message
...
Rostyslaw J. Lewyckyj wrote:
George Z. Bush wrote:

If you knew your history, or were around at the time, you'd know

without
being told that the only reason the US was in that "police action" at

all
was that the Soviet Union, during those relatively early UN Security

Council
days, took a walk during one of their political snits when the subject

came
up for discussion. The SC, in their absence, approved UN intervention

in
behalf of South Korea; had the Soviet ambassador been present during

that SC
discussion, they could easily (and undoubtedly would have) vetoed it,

since
they had the right to do that as all original members of the Security
Council could.


Common knowledge.


So, to answer your question, they fought in behalf of North Korea

because
North Korea was one of their client states to whom they furnished all

kinds
of military equipment and supplies, as well as the training in their

use.
They fought for the NKs because they did not want the world to think

their
MIG aircraft, in the hands of relatively green NK pilots, couldn't be
competitive with US military equipment. If they could have turned back

the
clock, there wouldn't even have been a war, because they'd have

prevented it
from happening. That's it, in a nutshell.

George Z.


So you explain, interpret, this as an expression of
simple commercial interests ? ;-)


Only in part. I thought it obvious that everybody would assume that they

would
stand up for their ideological bedfellows, and so I didn't think that part

of it
was worth mentioning.

(^-^))))

George Z.



Stalin and the Soviets planned, trained, and equipped the North Koreans to
prepare for the invasion as an instrument of Soviet foreign policy.