At 23:48 16 April 2012, kirk.stant wrote:
Don, do you race? Do you understand why there is a rule prohibiting
hardwa=
re or software that allows cloud flying?

We all understand that if you want to, it is now easy to cheat. But the
po=
int is that because of the rule, it is CHEATING, and if you are caught
you
=
get booted from the race.

When not racing, by all means have an AH - it can be a life saver. But
whe=
n you race you agree to play by the rules.

As far as carrying my Sig or Glock in my glider cockpit - You appear to
be
=
a Brit. So the most dangerous thing you would encounter following a
lando=
ut is probably a band of rowdy football (soccer to us colonials) fans.

In my backyard, I have rattlesnakes, scorpions, coyotes, etc. And in
some
=
of the places I fly over, there are human coyotes that are a lot more
dange=
rous. So if I choose to arm myself, because I can (unlike you poor
bloody
=
poms), then it's because I have evaluated the risk and feel it is worth
doi=
ng.

Also, a Sig is good for shooting out the AH from your cheating
competitor's=
instrument panel....

Cheers!

Kirk
66
"Gun control is hitting what you aim at - the first time..."

I think you are confusing having an AH with being allowed to cloud fly.
Cloud flying in competition is permmitted in the UK as is the fitting of an
AH. If the EASA rules are strictly complied with the removal of an AH is
not a simple task. A lot of gliders in the UK are fitted with AH for very
good reason, mine was although I took care to never deliberately set out to
fly in cloud. An even larger number, possibly a majority have a turn and
slip fitted. My point is simple, having a rule that says you cannot fly in
cloud is fine and enforceable. A ban on having an AH is not enforceable,
quite apart from the lash up that I built, my iPhone has an app that
provides that instrument so enforcing that ban is not possible without
draconian, and possibly unlawful measures, like searching every pilot
before they get into the cockpit. A rule that cannot be enforced is better
never made. Having an AH is not cheating, flying in cloud is (in some parts
of the world). By all means enforce no cloud flying, but crippling
technology is not the way to go about enforcing it. If someone wants to
cheat they will find a way of fitting an AH that you cannot see. Someone
who has no intention of cheating will not do so whatever instrument they
happen to have fitted.

I do not campaign against you right to bear arms so why should you campaign
to have software crippled that would improve safety where clouds are more
of a problem.