"~Nins~" wrote in message
news:T8G5c.22199$Cb.470749@attbi_s51...

Uhh, Stephen, even I think that's reaching a bit far to provide argument.
Maybe you should try a different one? Perhaps? I presented argument, and
a
valid one at that, earlier in the thread, go off of it but in from a
civil/legal standpoint. The human-animal thing just isn't going to work.



Why not? Human-animal marriage is just as valid as same-sex marriage.