"~Nins~" wrote in message
news:MxG5c.23130$1p.432539@attbi_s54...

You're getting into a whole other area there. Different *species*. You
do
what you want, but that is an argument that isn't going to work nor is a
valid one. But just for S&Gs, why do you think it would be valid?


I don't think human-animal marriage would be valid, but it would certainly
be just as valid as same-sex marriage.