Steven P. McNicoll wrote:
|| "~Nins~" wrote in message
|| news:MxG5c.23130$1p.432539@attbi_s54...
|||
||| You're getting into a whole other area there. Different *species*.
||| You do what you want, but that is an argument that isn't going to
||| work nor is a valid one. But just for S&Gs, why do you think it
||| would be valid?
|||
||
|| I don't think human-animal marriage would be valid, but it would
|| certainly be just as valid as same-sex marriage.

Why? How? On what source do you base this statement? So, you think
same-sex marriage is valid? Note what you said, how you worded it, "...just
as valid as same-sex marriage". You could re-word it as follows: Same-sex
marriage is just as invalid as human-animal marriages would be. Then,
provide the *why*, give reasons to back that up and provide references from
which you rely on to make the points in your argument. [Like I said, am
just trying to help, you sinking here. LoL.] Write down a major
point/statement of your argument, then do a search on the net for refs that
would support it. Clearly, the biblical sources don't count with the
opposing side, although it really should in my opinion, so find other
sources. http://www.findlaw.com/
Or, go to history sites to see if anything in historical events is present
to support, precedence. You get the idea now?

You're right, this is kinda fun. I'm approaching it from a different angle,
coaching, yeah I like it. ;-) hehe

Which group are you posting from?