In article T8G5c.22199$Cb.470749@attbi_s51, "~Nins~"
wrote:

Steven P. McNicoll wrote:
|| "Douglas Berry" wrote in message
|| ...
|||
||| And you are welcome to try to change them so you can marry sheep.
|||
||
|| If they can be changed to permit same-sex marriage they can be
|| changed to permit human-animal marriage.

Uhh, Stephen, even I think that's reaching a bit far to provide argument.
Maybe you should try a different one? Perhaps? I presented argument,
and a
valid one at that, earlier in the thread, go off of it but in from a
civil/legal standpoint. The human-animal thing just isn't going to work.

[Just trying to help.]





Does the sex of the sheep matter?

It may not be an irrelevant analogy, since Mr. McNicoll does seem to be
pulling the wool over certain eyes.