In message , Chad Irby
writes
In article ,
"Simon Robbins" wrote:
Then we have a contradiction if those in power knew Saddam's supposed
arsenal was limited to defensive weapons, no?

There's no such thing as a "defensive" chemical or biological weapon.

Define "defensive weapon". Is there such a thing as a "defensive"
firearm? If so, why cannot CW/BW be defensive in use also?

--
When you have to kill a man, it costs nothing to be polite.
W S Churchill

Paul J. Adam MainBoxatjrwlynch[dot]demon{dot}co(.)uk