After an exhausting session with Victoria's Secret Police, "Tarver
Engineering" confessed the following:
Gould's attempts to band aid together a plausable mechanism to replace
Darwin's impossible one is what was hillarious.
Gould's "The Structure of Evolutionary Theory" at 1474 pages, some
band-aid.
Once the period becomes short enough it is Creation.
This is too funny. How short is this period? And when did creation
occur?
[snip the short strokes of punctuated equilibrium]
Nice band aids, but evolution becomes creation when explaining the fosil
record that way.
Quoi? JT are you trying to tell us you believe in "creation science?"
A simple Yes or No will do.
Even in the evolutionist's odd world where the scientific method
has a different definition than all of the rest of science,
the criterion of "falsability" is demonstrated in that
Darwin's idea is undoubtably false.
JT evolution is a fact...we see evidence all around us every day. The
specific mechanisms of natural selection and evolution are debated all
the time.
My assertion is a concept directly from Freudian psycology and is science,
not religion.
OK...Frued.
Again please clarify for me, are you implying you believe the
so-called "creation science?" An answer would go a long way in
understanding your posts.
Juvat
|