View Single Post
  #7  
Old March 21st 04, 02:46 AM
Robey Price
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

After an exhausting session with Victoria's Secret Police, "Tarver
Engineering" confessed the following:

Gould's attempts to band aid together a plausable mechanism to replace
Darwin's impossible one is what was hillarious.


Gould's "The Structure of Evolutionary Theory" at 1474 pages, some
band-aid.

Once the period becomes short enough it is Creation.


This is too funny. How short is this period? And when did creation
occur?

[snip the short strokes of punctuated equilibrium]

Nice band aids, but evolution becomes creation when explaining the fosil
record that way.


Quoi? JT are you trying to tell us you believe in "creation science?"

A simple Yes or No will do.

Even in the evolutionist's odd world where the scientific method
has a different definition than all of the rest of science,
the criterion of "falsability" is demonstrated in that
Darwin's idea is undoubtably false.


JT evolution is a fact...we see evidence all around us every day. The
specific mechanisms of natural selection and evolution are debated all
the time.

My assertion is a concept directly from Freudian psycology and is science,
not religion.


OK...Frued.

Again please clarify for me, are you implying you believe the
so-called "creation science?" An answer would go a long way in
understanding your posts.

Juvat