View Single Post
  #5  
Old December 6th 12, 12:17 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 47
Default FAI (IGC) rules for US Club Class Nationals - Petition

On Wednesday, December 5, 2012 12:27:50 PM UTC-8, wrote:
On Tuesday, December 4, 2012 3:43:22 PM UTC-8, Sean F (F2) wrote:

We all know the US rules. But many, MANY have deep misconceptions about the FAI rules. Many disturbingly so...




Sean


F2




Sean,

I have flown 8 contests with IGC/FAI rules. I am disturbed that no one other than myself is concerned about light weight pilots flying with lead filled cockpits. How do you safely fasten the weight? How do you adjust the CG?

How do you support a rule that handicaps you if you don't fly at MTOW?

Rick Walters


Rick,

I appreciate your concern. Safety should ALWAYS be discussed openly.

I don't believe lead weight is inherently dangerous. When I was younger, shorter and a lot lighter, I used lead weight ballast responsibly. Nobody thought is was controversial. I'm not saying use of lead weight can't be applied irresponsibly. That same pilot can also be unsafe in any number of other areas as well, not just lead weight.

At the last Club Class WGC there were likely pilot(s) adding lead weight. However, it was a non-issue. I'm not aware of a pilot adding lead weight because it apparently wasn't controversial enough to make conversation.

I KNOW OF a US pilot adding lead weight flying Sports Class here in the US. Apparently the advantage of flying at max weight is more advantageous than handicap adjustment.

Unless the RC outlaws lead weight in US contests I suspect it will continue to happen just like it will in FAI rules.

Sean Franke (HA)