Does anyone argue against Dave, that there is not an
unacceptably high 'drivel content' in Soaring magazine? I don't.
Counting pages in the last issue, I'd put the 'obvious drivel' at
90%. Even the few pages that seem useful, I can't help but be
uncertain about, since I feel there is no knowledgeable editorial
supervision.


At 19:42 11 February 2013, Dave Nadler wrote:
Seriously, do you guys still read Snoring ?

The high drivel content (as the above-mentioned letter,
dubious technical articles, and limited of coverage of
modern gliding) has caused many I know (and me) to just
stop reading it.

Again, do you still read this ?
Or do you read Gliding International, S&G, and other
possibly more relevant rags ?

Just wondering...
Best Regards, Dave