On 8/05/2013 01:48, Paul Remde wrote:
Hi Pete,

I don't use written declarations. I've never had a problem in 15 years
with electronic declarations for many badge and record flights. If it
is done correctly it is extremely reliable.

But how reliable is it if NOT 'done correctly'? How easy is it to know
it's been 'done correctly' electronically compared to a written
declaration?. Written ones are inherently 'extremely reliable' for
those of us who aren't software gurus.

If software was reliable, straightforward and predictable, the number of
posts on r.a.s. would be halved.

GC



Best Regards,

Paul Remde
________________________________

"Pete Startup" wrote in message
...

For the flights that matter? - hand written declaration every time. Would
you trust your diamonds to gadgets?

At 05:58 07 May 2013, Wade wrote:
If see you mobile was registered to someone else and they are letting you
borrow their PDA for a badge flight, the name attached to the
registration
is what gets declared to any other devices linked up (Cambridge 302 for
example).

I can enter a separate pilot in the Cambridge 302/303 but I don't want a
task declared through to the 302/303 with a different name from see you
mobile. Does anyone know a good solution to this one?

Thanks
Wade