View Single Post
  #90  
Old March 26th 04, 07:56 PM
Chad Irby
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article ,
".impervious" wrote:

In om,
Chad Irby attempted to impart some wisdom, instead sputtering:


: On the other hand, the "smart" people like Clinton and Gore spent
: eight years *not* doing anything about the terror problem, yet the
: "dumb" Bush is supposed to have fixed it in eight months...

you call strategic bombing,


Blowing up empty training camps and an aspirin factory... with pretty
much zero results.

doubling the overall counterterrorism budget,


....for domestic terrorism and "cyberterrorism"...

and tripling the counterterrorism budget specifically for the
FBI not doing anything?


....in an attempt to catch domestic terrorists like McVey... not to
mention Clarke's myopic focus on cyberterrorism for a few years.

how about coming up with the original plan for
a Department of Homeland Security, which Bush scoffed at until 9/11?


How about it? A "plan" that was never implemented is just a piece of
paper. Much like the rest of the Clinton "efforts."

how about capturing, trying, and convicting those responsible for the
original WTC attack in '93, even though Clinton had only been in office
for *38 days* when it happened?


Since the FBI did that, with the help of an idiot terrorist who went and
tried to get his deposit back from the rental truck company...

....and then did *nothing* else. They didn't catch the people who
financed it, and let one of the plotters get away. To Iraq, of course
(whatever happened to "Iraq has no ties to al-Qaeda?").

there was no "fixing" the terror problem.


Not the way the Clinton/Clarke folks went about it.

but had he listened to those in the know, 9/11 may not have happened.
and after it DID happen, we spent about 3 minutes in Afghanistan,
where we knew some of the culprits to be,


Hey - isn't that the place Clinton fired a bunch of cruise missiles at,
and didn't accomplish anything? The place where we had at least two
different chances to kill Osama bin Laden, but Clinton and Clarke
decided not to?

The place where we went in and removed the Taliban, which was directly
supporting al-Qaeda, *after* Clinton left office? The place we've been
in for a couple of years now (not "three minutes")?

and moved on to Iraq, which had exactly zip to do with the
attack.


Other than sheltering al-Qaeda terrorists who took part in the *first*
WTC attack. And other nice folks, too (like Abbas, who died in custody
recently after being captured in Iraq, where he'd been living i comfort
for years).

our fearless leader at one point called Osama a "non-priority,"
a quote that he'll never be able to run from.


Funny... I can't find that quote. Maybe you're confusing Bush with
Clinton again?

--
cirby at cfl.rr.com

Remember: Objects in rearview mirror may be hallucinations.
Slam on brakes accordingly.