Kevin Brooks wrote:

"qwerty" wrote in message
om...

"Tarver Engineering" wrote in message
...

"Tempest" wrote in message
...
Leslie Swartz wrote:

And you think "Iran/Contra" was what, exactly?

A criminal act.

What is Clarke's perjury?

Cool! Bring on the perjury charges and the trial. Let's start next week
or
the summer at the latest! I can't wait to see Bush, Rumsfeld, Cheney,
Rice,
Powell, etc. testifying UNDER OATH in a court of Law concerning his
testimony!

They would not have to. Simply bringing the transcripts of his statements
under oath in 2002 into evidence, versus his statements to the commission,
under oath, will be enough to hang the clown.

Bring it on.

If Clarke felt there was a problem, he'd be all over the media with
clarifications.

Oh wait, isn't Rice doing that now?

I guess Bush has a problem.

--
"The tyranny of a prince is not so dangerous to the public welfare as
the apathy of a citizen in a democracy."
- Baron de Montesquieu, 1748