View Single Post
  #9  
Old June 11th 13, 11:55 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Bill D
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 746
Default Improved shear/stall-spin alarms

On Tuesday, June 11, 2013 4:27:04 PM UTC-6, Ralph Jones wrote:
On Mon, 10 Jun 2013 12:00:58 -0700 (PDT), Bill D

wrote:



[snip]



To me, pressure ports on the top and bottom of the nose cone seems the least intrusive.




What about contamination by runway crud?



rj


No worse than static ports or pitot tubes. The ports I'm thinking of would be just like static ports - flush with the surface.