"Scott Ferrin" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 28 Mar 2004 11:52:52 -0800, "Tarver Engineering"
wrote:


"Scott Ferrin" wrote in message
.. .
On Sun, 28 Mar 2004 09:35:24 -0800, "Tarver Engineering"
wrote:


"Lyle" wrote in message
.. .
On Fri, 26 Mar 2004 15:37:19 -0700, Scott Ferrin
wrote:

On 26 Mar 2004 10:17:09 GMT, (MLenoch) wrote:

Has the configuration and mission been publicized for the FB-22 as
contrasted
to the F/A-22? The press has written of the two, but I don't
recall
the
descriptions and differences of the bomber aspect.
Thx in advance,
VL


So far from what I've read it's becoming a PR disaster. The USAF
needs to be crystal clear what they are talking about as the
clueless
politicians are already getting the whole mess confused and whining
that in order to put the "A" in "F/A-22" it's going to cost $11
billion additional dollars.
even the F-15A and F-14A were able to drop bombs from the start,
even
though they may not have had the best delivery system in the world.
How hard would it be to design a external stealthy bombay to put
under
the wings, i mean if your going to spend $11 billion dollars you
might
as well design a replacement for the F-15E. And you could also put
the
external weapons bay on the JSF.

And at only $329 million each, the fighter version is such a bargain.

(GAO)


And most that sky high price is because they keep slashing numbers.

It is because of the Peter Principle that Lockmart's F-22 is so
expensive.
If the buy is cut another 1/3 as I expect, your favorite fighter will
cost
over $400 million a copy. It is what I wrote in '98 and I have been
attacked at ram for some years on the issue, but I am, unfortunately for
the
American tax payer, completely correct again.


And yet you still don't get that it's because of the fixed R&D etc.

I get it just fine and always have, Scott. You on the other hand have been
a rude about something you know little to nothing about.

Flyaway cost is quoted at about $150 million.

Geeze, you can't even keep any nu,mber straight.

The next issue of F-22s is $110 million each.

The fixed stuff has to
be paid whether we buy ten or a thousand.

The fixed part has been driven by the Peter Principle, someything Ken
Garlington demonstrated to beyond a shadow of a doubt.