zepp wrote:

On Mon, 29 Mar 2004 11:52:42 -0800, "Tarver Engineering"
wrote:


"Tammy" wrote in message
. com...
".impervious" wrote in message
.. .
In om,
Chad Irby attempted to impart some wisdom, instead sputtering:

: In article ,
: (Tammy) wrote:
:
:
:: So far there have been no outright discrepancies. The closest that
:: the GOPs could get is that as an aide to Bush, he only released
:: positive information to the press and saved the negative information
:: until after he left the White House.
::
:: There are three things to keep in mind.
::
:: 1. He was a Reagan appointee, and served 4 presidents. Not exactly a
:: poster child for anti-GOP views.
:
: He was a long-term bureaucrat who quit during the current
: administration after being denied the promotion he wanted (and being
: effectively demoted). The worst thing in the world to happene to a
: dedicated paper pusher. That's reason enough.


He quit in disgust. The Bush administration is on record of asking him
not to quit.

Clarke had already been fired by the State Department in 1992 for lieing.
It is not surprising that GW demoted Clarke repeatedly and then put him out
at 30 years.

More pure unalderated bull**** from the desperate trash right, I see.

I guess someone should start a lies told by reTarv list.

--
"The tyranny of a prince is not so dangerous to the public welfare as
the apathy of a citizen in a democracy."
- Baron de Montesquieu, 1748