From: "Tarver Engineering"
Date: 3/31/2004 8:19 PM Central Standard Time
Message-id:


"B2431" wrote in message
...
From: "Tarver Engineering"

"OXMORON1" wrote in message
...
Dan wrote:
It has to be a fake. Tarver is a legend in his own mind, is never
wrong
and
will NEVER say he is. Just ask him.

I think you are wrong this time Dan, Tarver has on rare occasions
admitted
to
mis-speaking as opposed to another individual who NEVER makes or ADMITS
a
mistake or is it misteak?

Dan made a fool of himself for years peddling Knoyle's archive troll,
until
he saw the paradox of Knoyle's ignorance. Still no apology.


Tarver, someday you will have to explain to us what "Knoyle's archive
troll"
means. Everything I ever cited as coming from you came from a Google
search,
not Knoyle's or any of the other sites dedicated to you.

Right.

There are similar sites dedicated to you in several forums from hot air
balooning to cars to homebuilt aircraft to this one. You have made such a
fool
of yourself in all those forums that people collect the "tarverisms" into
sites. They are not all made by Knoyle or any other individual.

I made up the term Tarverism.

Be a man Dan and post up that apology.

Apologize for what? Not stooping to your level by being vulgar and making
personal attacks? For not using Knoyle's archives to remind you of some of the
incredibly strange assertions you have made? For disagreeing with you on
systems I have worked and you haven't? For not getting angry when you
repeatedly claimed I had been thrown out of the Air Force with a dishonourable?
For proving you wrong with facts from reliable sources? For asking you to cite
independant and reliable sources? For not believing you are correct when
reliable and independant expert sources have proved you wrong?

Just what am I supposed to apologize for?

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired