View Single Post
  #82  
Old April 4th 04, 02:12 AM
James Robinson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Chad Irby wrote:

"patLB" wrote:

On the other hand, you could always visit Spain, and relax on their
nice, safe, high-speed trains. Or the ones in France.


Still waiting for the high speed trains of USA...


The distances are too long. Air travel is cheaper for that sort of
range,


What gave you that idea. High speed trains are effective in the range
of 200 to 500 miles. There are lots of large cities within that
distance. Just draw a circle around Chicago or Washington, and see how
many cities are enclosed. For that distance, trains have a lower
operating cost and aircraft. Don't just think of transcontinental
service, where aircraft have the advantage.

Any moron with a chunk of steel can knock a train off the tracks.


... and as we've found out, trains are far too prone to sabotage.


The terrorists just picked trains for their latest attack. Trains are
no more at risk than any other place where people congregate. The next
attack might be in the lineup for tickets for Disney World, at a
shopping center during Christmas shopping, on a ferry boat, and so on.