On Wednesday, February 19, 2014 7:36:56 PM UTC-5, Steve Leonard wrote:
Chris has hit the nail on the head with his testing and reporting. When it goes wrong, it goes wrong fast. Faster than you can possibly react. We can try all we want to teach how to not do it, but it will sometimes happen. Why not come up with a system that will minimize the risk to the towpilot? I think we have concluded that for now, we cannot eliminate it without creating other significant problems. If we are considering an automatic system, why wait to full nose up elevator and nose down 20 degrees? As Chris said, if you are there, you are probably doomed. If the nose is down 10 degrees (or maybe even 5?) and the elevator is half way to full up, something is wrong. Would you agree? On tow, elevator is up, nose is up. On descent, elevator is down, nose is down. Why not develop and test a parallel releasing system that has inputs from a gyro for pitch attitude and a simple sensor for elevator position? Test at safe altitude, as Chris and company did. I know this is not going to prevent kiting, but if we can reduce the risk when it happens and maybe not even add bad failure modes, it should be well worth the effort. Just my thoughts. Steve Leonard

The least expensive improvement that many operations can make immediately is to adopt the use of longer tow ropes.The effect of pilot error is drastically reduced by this one simple change. Many places I fly as guest use ropes that are marginally short as matter of standard practice.
We try not to use ropes shorter than 200 ft.
UH