Let us agree that I know where the F/A-18 stick breaks out at (20#) and
that you and monkey are clueless.

Once again, the Tarverbot shows his OWN cluelessness.

--
Mike Kanze

"The hot dog is the reductio ad absurdum of American eating. The Sicilian
in the ditch, though he may never be President, knows better: he puts a
slice of onion between his slabs of bread, not a cartridge filled with the
sweepings of abattoirs."

- H. L. Mencken (1926)

Hooray for the start of ballpark franks and Major League Baseball this week!


"Tarver Engineering" wrote in message
news

"Doug "Woody" and Erin Beal" wrote in message
...
On 4/5/04 12:19 PM, in article , "Tarver
Engineering" wrote:


"Doug "Woody" and Erin Beal" wrote in
message
SNIP
Yes. Truly. It's in the NATOPS and everything. My confusion with
your
statements is this occasional mention of a "break out" or "break out
force." There is nothing like that.

I know that information from having desiged the first accuratee F/A-18
simulator at Dryden. The reason for bringing up the break out force
in
the
first place was to demonstrate how much force a Flanker applying an
additional 33# of force directly into his crotch to do a cobra would
be
risking. It is a completely different thread, but monkey wanted to
branch
off into a demonstration is his huge penis and then immediately
stepped
on
same.


Flanker, whatever... It's not a Hornet, which was where I came into this
discussion. Okay? As long as you're agreeing that there's no break out
force in the Hornet, we're square.

Let us agree that I know where the F/A-18 stick breaks out at (20#) and
that
you and monkey are clueless. That is so much easier than stroking your
fragile ego, Woody. It is a safety of flight issue and I am not going to
budge on the fact. If Canada chooses to use less safe operators for their
F-18s then that is their business.