This currently a valid style of arguing. It uses the "Liberal Emotionalism" of arguing based on how it "feels"... Does killing birds to make power make you feel good?. Death and dismemberment pictures along with statistics (validity is immaterial, because it comes from a website, so they must be true, but only Sean's)It uses "Green" tactics against "Green Energy".... At least you can thermal from a coal or Frame gas generator stack....

@ Sean: Have you contacted PETA? They need to get in on this action... ;o)

Very few people see the validity or benefit of soaring, more people will identify with the killing of birds. The soaring public would benefit without the wind farm, but realistically, those merits fail on their own.

The enemy of my enemy is my friend...



On Monday, March 24, 2014 11:41:22 AM UTC-6, Sean Fidler wrote:
Dan, sometimes you have to go with the argument that can win the war.



A) Gliders not being able to fly on their ridges? Public (and especially govt bureaucrats) could care less.



B) Majestic Raptors (many endangered) along with all birds getting brutally killed en masse by Green Energy and clear liberal double standards? No we have something to fight with....



At minimum it drives the liberals crazy. And that ain't half bad...



;-)