On Mon, 12 Apr 2004 23:49:02 GMT, "copertopkiller"
wrote:


wrote in message
.. .
On Mon, 12 Apr 2004 15:22:04 GMT, "copertopkiller"
wrote:

Furthermore, if I was privy
to the Intel that was being received now claimed to not be actionable I
would have taken serious measures.

Like what, Bryan?

Like what you have been slapped in the face with before.

You haven't even come close to "slapping" me Bryan.

Can you explain why then with armed AC and AA bateries available none
where
successful or used at all?

There were no anti aircraft batteries available that day, Bryan.

Please provide some information.

Been there done that, Bryan. Go Google it.

And
armed aircraft were dispatched to follow the hijacked aircraft.


Not one AC was intercepted therefore none were successful.

Which has nothing to do with whether the procedures were followed.