Thread
:
No More New Fighter Aircraft Types?
View Single Post
#
20
April 13th 04, 07:48 PM
WaltBJ
external usenet poster
Posts: n/a
ess (phil hunt) wrote in message ...
On Mon, 12 Apr 2004 13:55:05 +0200, Emmanuel Gustin wrote:
What is needed, clearly, is a revised approach to aircraft
development. SNIP:
No mierda, Dick Tracy.
One of Kelly's aids to success was that no one stuck their fingers in
his pies. He knew where he was going, herded his troops in the right
direction, overrode (mostly) the impediments (Viz. A11 security) and
got the job done in an outstanding manner. Now every swinging SOB
sticks his nose in the tent and stirs the pot - it's a wonder anything
gets done, and all the while Congress is both slowing things down with
investigations and continuing pressures to build something/anything
'in my district' and meanwhile the overhead keeps piling up day after
day, year after year, and it's all added to the cost of the airplane.
The 22 should have been in service test in 1990.
Walt BJ
WaltBJ