"Jim Baker" wrote in message
...

"Ed Rasimus" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 11 Apr 2004 16:15:51 -0600, Scott Ferrin
wrote:



From this week's AW&ST

"Air Force May Form Strategic Command"


Would that also be known as "Strategic Air Command" with the
associated acronym of SAC?

Actually, it is a review of the "unified" command structure,
considering combining of the recently established Northern Command
with the long existing Southern Command to form a sort of N/S America
continental command. Other unified commands include Eucom, Pacom and
Centcom for examples.

Strategic Air Command was a "specified" command which gave it a
separate status from the operational control of the unified commands.
The other specified command was MAC.


Ed Rasimus

According to Aviation Week (April 12 2004 issue, page 23), it's not a
Joint
Staff initiative but rather an AF plan. The USAF is considering
reshuffling
it's commands to better provide forces for US STRATCOM. Currently, 8th
AF
provides much of the manpower and equipment for use by STRATCOM and for
reasons unstated in the article, they think creating a new command,
"AFStrat", (Air Force Strategic Command) would do a better job than 8th
AF.
This has nothing to do with the Unified Command Plan in a structural
sense,
it's all about the AF performing it's role in manning/training/equipping
the
units that serve the combatant (Unified/Specified)commands. Just a
guess,
but maybe the bombers that are still nuclear capable would move from 8th
to
AFStrat under this plan.

Cheers,

JB


"Mark" wrote in message
...
If AFStrat comes to fruition, I don't think it will be structure along
nuclear/conventional lines. The "new" USSTRATCOM has moved well beyond
the
'traditional' WWIII role/mission and if anything the long range
conventional
and IO aspects are now the more dominant aspect of the command. I would
think AFSTRAT would be aligned along those lines???

FWIW

Mark

I agree Mark, you're probably correct there.

JB