View Single Post
  #7  
Old April 14th 04, 12:00 AM
Pete
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"copertopkiller" wrote

Speed and distance that intercepts need to travel have nothing to do with
procedures not being followed. This is a fact that you do not aseem to
comprehend or be able to refute with data and/or by "reputable" cites.

You were requested to supply the specifics and incorporate them into your
statement anyway. You haven't and cannot be taken seriously.


Speed references for an F-15 or -16: www.fas.org
Distance from Otis ANGB, MA to NYC or Langley AFB, VA to Wash, DC :
www.mapquest.com

Have fun.

They were not successful in intercepting the hijacked AC
Why?
Either they did not a) launch early enough, or b) fly fast enough
Why not?

That is the question...
Was it some grand design conspiracy in the
identification/authorization/launch/intercept process?
Or was it considered to be a standard hijacking? (In which case alert

jets
were not always launched)


The silence here is astounding.

If none did, and that is what they were supposed to do....then why

didn't
they?
You're the one making the claim. Fess up, son.



I have made a claim that is widely known, moron.


It is also 'widely known' that Elvis was sighted in 1995. Doesn't make it
true, though.

Pete
bye bye for now. I'm on vacation for a few days.