On Fri, 16 Apr 2004 03:22:52 GMT, "copertopkiller"
wrote:


wrote in message
.. .
On Thu, 15 Apr 2004 01:36:20 GMT, "copertopkiller"
wrote:


wrote in message
.. .
On Wed, 14 Apr 2004 18:54:02 GMT, "copertopkiller"
wrote:


This is a violation in SOP that call for immediate supervisory
notification
with the FAA Highjack coordinator being that supervisor. When Payne
Sterwart's AC stopped responding it took ATC/FAA to notify the
military
of a
problem in 24 minutes and this was not a determined highjacking just a
errant private AC.

And it took NORAD another hour to intercept the aircraft. By that
standard, 9/11 was a wizzbang success.

The point was it took ATC/FAA to notify the military of a problem in 24
minutes and this was not a determined highjacking

And how exactly was that determined with no communication with the
pilot of the aircraft?

Think about it genius.

But, Bryan, your argument has been that in the absence of knowledge,
the ATC folks should treat it as an emergency and dispatch
interceptors IMMEDIATELY. Hypocrite.

"FAA regulations do not specifically tell NORAD to scramble AC." --
Bryan Pataky aka copertopkiller