On Fri, 07 May 2004 00:00:37 GMT, "copprtopkiller"
wrote:


wrote in message
.. .
On Thu, 06 May 2004 02:42:00 GMT, "copprtopkiller"
wrote:

Simply fascinating! "Do not specifically tell" equates to nonexistent in
your world.

In the real world, Bryan, that is correct.

NO, in your usenet world. snicker

Then go ahead and explain how procedures that don't tell NORAD to
scramble aircraft can result in the launch of aircraft.

If there are no procedures
telling NORAD to scramble fighters, then those procedures obviously
don't exist. If they do, why don't you cite them? Oh, yeah, you've
said that they don't exist.

FAA Procedures don't give the FAA authority over the US Military. Maybe in
your world of Usenet marshmellow pies. Here is what I stated, again:
"FAA regulations do not specifically tell NORAD to scramble AC. FAA
Procedures explain what duties NORAD are during the intercept". What part of
the sentence containing the word "specifically" don't you understand and how
does one equate this as evidence nonexistent procedures for intercept is
beyond preposterous.

Only to you, Bryan.