Scott MacEachern wrote:

No protected person may be punished for an offence he
or she has not personally committed.

The Law of Reciprocity is not considered as a punishment per se and as such
does not fit Article 33.

Reprisals against protected persons and their property
are prohibited.

I'll have to find the Law of Reciprocity, because this statement runs counter
to its intent. The intent of the Law of Reciprocity is that if nation X bombs
religious sites in nation y than nation y is *legally* allowed to bomb nation
X's religious sites on a 1 for 1 basis.

I'll have do a Google and find the article dealing with reciprocity.


BUFDRVR

"Stay on the bomb run boys, I'm gonna get those bomb doors open if it harelips
everyone on Bear Creek"