What WB said about the trim might give the same appearance if a pilot were giving it extra effort.

From my limited observations and help rigging and derigging Schweizer single place gliders, I believe there is more butt-end structure where the 1-26's and 1-34's spar carry-through meets than on a 1-36, where if I recall correctly, the carry-throughs don't meet. Could be wrong though, it's been a long time. I was sensitive to this as a 1-36 near Colorado Springs returned from a flight with more dihedral than it departed with and another wound up in a BBQ pit in Boulder when a wing folded up. Not saying both weren't abused in flight, but the second ended up in a lengthy, ultimately unsuccessful, litigation with the operator's estate. Am also aware of at least a 1-26 where the wing folded up also, with better results. But never had access to a 1-26D or E to fly.

Frank Whiteley

On Saturday, January 3, 2015 9:58:10 AM UTC-7, Cookie wrote:
Twitchy?? Or "responsive"....

Once you get used to it, and keep a steady hand...it flies great!

I think the wing rood is the same as the 1-34 (basically 1-36 has shorter 1-34 wings...)....Never heard of s structural problem with either 34 or 36....


Cookie






After looking at the rigging and construction of the root assembly of 1-36, I decided I'd rather not fly one. Those few that did fly the one we had for a few years always seemed to be on the verge of PIO's on take off. AFAIK, only one instructor ever flew it. Perhaps what you describe resulted in a tendency to over control. I always though it looked twitchy.

Frank Whiteley