Thread: FLARM ethics
View Single Post
  #2  
Old February 27th 15, 05:25 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Andy Blackburn[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 608
Default FLARM ethics

On Thursday, February 26, 2015 at 4:47:27 PM UTC-8, waremark wrote:

I suspect that some of the Flarm hardware is too limited to run two different protocols.


I confess I was thinking about the US where there is only PowerFLARM. Backward compatibility all the way to the original hardware creates some additional constraints in all likelihood.

9B