"Savageduck" wrote in message
news:2015031123103280979-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom...
On 2015-03-12 06:00:11 +0000, Savageduck
said:
On 2015-03-12 05:54:31 +0000, Savageduck said:
On 2015-03-12 05:48:34 +0000, Savageduck said:
On 2015-03-07 13:35:28 +0000, Indrek said:
"RiŠardo" wrote in message
...
On 07/03/2015 00:49, Indrek wrote:
Thank you Indrek, good stuff yet again. However, do take ca
http://www.theguardian.com/world/201...ecurity-claims
Thanks
Ricardo.
Thankfully, Malaysia is a very tolerant country so I encountered no
problems while taking photos at the airport. Clearly, other countries
have a different attitude. I seem to recall a British anorak
plane-spotter was arrested fairly recently in Greece, for example.
Many
years ago I was in Entebbe and saw a large notice at the airport
forbidding photography of military aircraft. The only military
aircraft
in sight were a couple of decrepit Dakotas. I did wonder what possible
significance could be attached to them, but dutifully obeyed the
injunction.
Good thing they weren't watching me with my load of camera gear too
closely at AMS.
Oops! Lets try that again.
I hate to say this but something isn't working quite right here. So
here is attempt #3.
If it doesn't fly this time I will switch Usenet clients and give it a
final try.
Sorry for the messy posts folks. :-(
...and here is that final try:
image
--
Regards,
Savageduck
That's certainly an atmospheric picture. Was it HDR from multiple exposures,
or from a single exposure?
Cheers,
Indrek Aavisto
--
"The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed (and
hence clamorous to be led to safety), by menacing it with an endless series
of hobgoblins, all of them imaginary."
- H.L. Mencken
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
http://www.avast.com