"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote in message
nk.net...

"WalterM140" wrote in message
...

If we had to incur 5,000 casualties in the war on terror, they should not
have
been incurred in Iraq. I don't know why you can't get that.


The war on terror is being fought in Iraq. Why can't you get that?

Finally I've got it! Since actual terrorists are sort of hard to find,
Iraq is some sort of a surrogate for the real thing; a whipping boy so to speak.
But if we can go anywhere we want to fight this war on terror, (even if it makes
no sense) then why not choose some place more convenient than Iraq? How about:
Cuba? Canada? Chicago?