"Paul J. Adam" wrote in message
...

One shell, apparently dated pre-1991 - this isn't a clear and present
danger. (The production facility for it would be - no signs so far)


Didn't the Iraqis claim they never had any Sarin at all? If that's the
case, doesn't the presence of even one shell prove they did not abide by the
1991 agreement?



Note also that at one point there was a declared "flypaper strategy" of
using Iraq as bait to draw in and destroy terrorists -


That seems to be happening now.