View Single Post
  #7  
Old March 19th 16, 05:01 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
2G
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,439
Default Shameless update from Dale Kramer

On Friday, March 18, 2016 at 10:04:29 PM UTC-7, DaleKramer wrote:
On Saturday, March 19, 2016 at 12:11:30 AM UTC-4, DaleKramer wrote:
Your comments definitely indicate that you did not read the information at the link I provided and if you did, you did not evaluate any of in that manner that I would expect and engineer to evaluate the information.


Sorry, sometimes fingers don't type what my brain thinks

Should be:
Your comments definitely indicate that you did not read the information at the link I provided and if you did, you did not evaluate any of it in a manner that I would expect an engineer to evaluate the information.


You seem awfully defensive at answering questions for someone seeking public investment in your project. You should EXPECT critical questions such as mine. Investors DO NOT like being belittled for asking reasonable questions.. Your disk loading is SEVEN times higher than an R22; that is a HIGH disk loading.

Your material provides nothing about how this aircraft will be controlled during hover flight and transition from hovering to forward flight. I assume this will be done by thrust vectoring, but I do not know. This means that power must be reduced in some of the electric motors, exacerbating the effects of a motor failure.