In article ,
Ed Rasimus wrote:
What did we get out of it? We changed the way we organize, train and
fight our wars. We lost one F-105 for every 65 sorties over N. Vietnam
in '66 and '67. We lost one fixed wing aircraft for every 3500 sorties
during Desert Storm. We lost one fixed wing aircraft...period, in
Iraqi Freedom for 16,500 sorties. We learned some lessons.
Do you suppose the fact that Iraq didn't have the advantage of real-time
super-power support (from the Soviets) in the form of arms, training,
and "advisors" has anything to do with it?
You might want to check out the equippage, advising, training and
doctrine in place at the start of Desert Storm
What part of "real-time" support, arming, training, and advisors do you
not understand?
... before repeating that bit of revisionism.
The only revisionism here are people trying to imply that battlefield
opposition in Iraq was even a fraction of what existed in Vietnam (or
Korea, for that matter)
Some analysts even contend that the failure of
Soviet militarysupport so clearly displayed contributed to the
collapse of the SU.
Some analysts also claim Elvis was hiding in the same rat hole with
Saddam...but escaped. Gorbachev's glasnost/perestroika policies are the
main reason the East Bloc collapsed.
--Mike
|