View Single Post
  #31  
Old October 3rd 16, 04:02 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Loye Hilton[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 21
Default Remote thermal detection

At 13:03 03 October 2016, Tango Whisky wrote:
Le dimanche 2 octobre 2016 20:57:45 UTC+2, Jonathan St. Cloud

a =C3=A9crit=
=C2=A0:
In the eighty's or nineties there was an article in "Soaring" by

an U.S.
=
Army Apache trainee, who noticed he could see raising thermal

through his
m=
onocle. Not sure which sensor array was picking that up, but I

thought it
=
was the FLIR.
=20
On Sunday, October 2, 2016 at 11:04:32 AM UTC-7, David

Hirst wrote:
On Monday, October 3, 2016 at 4:04:39 AM UTC+13,

Jonathan St. Cloud
wro=
te:
A FLIR unit might offer a visual indication from much larger

distance=
? =20

A few moons ago, I got chatting to a guy selling FLIR imaging

systems
a=
t a trade show. I asked him about the problem of trying to see

thermals,
s=
o we set an imager up to look at the hot air rising from a nearby

vent and
=
saw nothing (as he expected). =20
There's no problem seeing warm solid objects, since they

consist of a
l=
ot of closely-packed warm emitters - high spatial density - but

warm gas
is=
so much more diffuse that any infrared 'brightness' just fades

into the
ba=
ckground, like a small amount of dye in a large volume of liquid.

To do
ef=
fective background subtraction, you need to know what the

background is to
=
begin with and on a typical thermal day this is the average

temperature of
=
the air which has high spatial variability.
I think birds can see all those rising insects, which makes the

birds
t=
he best thermal indicators, if they can be bothered to fly where we

want
th=
em to.
=20
DH
TX


You cannot detect hot air from a distance by any infrared detector

(and
FLI=
R is infrared imaging). Obviously, your sales guy wasn't up to

speed with
p=
hysics.

Hot air emits infrard radiation. However, as emission and

absorption
coeffi=
cients are the same thing, the air inbetween the thermal and your

FLIR
will=
absorb all of this radiation, and you won't see anything on your

imager.
T=
hat's how physics works. The stories about people having seen

infrared
imag=
es of thermals are just urband legends.

Bert (who has been developing infrared sensors and systems for

more than
15=
years)
In the early 70's Wally Scott was flying a OD Green 1-34 ? for MIT

and they were trying to see dust particles in thermals in west texas.
with todays tech. it may be possible.any body else remember this.