The codes in question were the A5 and B5 versions. That is the code
book was changed from A to B but the additive (random number) book
was left at 5. In August 1945 the USN noted it had 4,907 out of 50,000
additives for the 5 book. Which explains quite well why the main effect
of the failure to change additive books did not compromise the code
values, but did compromise the fact the basic code system was still in use.
If it did compromise the code values then it should have compromised
the A version as well, yet the USN
eports knowing around 5% of the
code values when work stopped around March 1941.
On plain English that means the Japanase continued to blunder away JN25 B
continuously for two months.
In plain English Denyav does not have a clue.
In Plain English you will continue to deny what really happened in the days
prior to Pearl Harbor.
Heck even some main actors of Pearl Harbor,like Stimson and Churchill etc
admitted it.
You are really very good in hiding reality behind too many irrelevant words.
What did you say now?
US stopped recovering codes in March when only 5% codes were recovered.
First of all do you believe to what you say?
Everbody knew that US and Japan were moving toward a confrontation in Pasific
and and US had a golden opportunity to recover all japanese naval codes,and
suddenly US stopped work on code recovering in March only after a couple of
months work!!!!.
Code recovering did not stop in March,it did not stop on Dec.7 either.
According to your data US recovered roughly 5000 codes by March which seems to
be correct.
But even with 5000 recoveries you can read the most of the messages.
"A large code as many as 55000 values ,but in actual practice ,such was
streotyped nature of the text,7000 recoveries permitted almost complete
decyription,and many pattern messages could be read practicaly entire with as
few as 1500 meanings"(History of OP-20-GYP-1,NSA)
ou see folks, conspiracy land would have the Red Cross must have
known, after all there they were preparing for air raids. Note that in
March 1941 the IJN attack was still in the is it possible discussion
phase between senior leaders.
For a different view please check out:
http://www.usni.org/Naval History/Articles/NHborgquist6.htm
Yes change the subject time. Try and defend the first Churchill
quote and wish away the second.
Is quoting from one page and wishing away others a priviledge given only to
Gov't employees?
I did not know that.
the specific attacks, not the
war as a whole. Drag the Red Cross leadership into the conspiracy claims.
You are very smart really,Red Cross of early 40s had more in common with FEMA
of 2001 ,than the Red Cross of 2001.
By the way in case people are wondering Denyav is wandering the
conspiracy theory web sites, yet again Mark Willey's one or
conspiracy central, looking for that out of context quote to throw in.
Just type a key phrase into a search engine and see which site
Denyav is copying, watch the
Thats seems to be big problem for the custodians of Pearl Harbor conspiracy.
The public interest in books and websites telling them what their Great Leaders
did not and do not tell is skyrocketing specially after 9/11.
I think now its pretty safe assume that so called conspiracy theories are now
becoming mainstream theories accepted by the most of the people.
Congratulations on a non relevant quote, by the way ever going to tell
us why the invasion of the Philippines, Wake and Guam and
What Stimson said is irrelevant,
What Churchill said is irrelevent.
What Congressman Dies said is irrelevant.
What Joseph Grew said is irrelevant.
What Haan said is irrelevant.
What US Army Gen.Rhorpe said is irrelevant.
What Popov said is irrelevant.
What Journalist Leib said is irrelevant.
What Capt.Rannefft of Dutch Navy said is irrelevant.
Countless others are irrelevant.
So whats relevant?
Of course the words of Pearl Harbor conspiracy custodians!!.
No wonder books,movies and websites telling what the custodians try to hide are
experiencing a boom.
Simply put,people do not want to hear lies only any longer.
Too bad for the custodians.