"Tuollaf43" wrote in message
m...
"Aardvark J. Bandersnatch, MP" wrote in message
news:jbnDc.186536$Ly.72@attbi_s01...
"Fred J. McCall" wrote in message
...
(Karen Gordon) wrote:

K): Would that be the 'superior U.S. airforce' that has killed
thousands
f innocent civilians and allies in its various invasions of other
:countries?
:--
: """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" """""""""""""""""
: You don't have to fool all the people all of the time;
: you just have to fool enough to get elected. - G. Barzan
: """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" """""""""""""""""

And they've obviously found one fool up in the Frozen North.

Are the overwhelming majority of Canadians really this mentally
challenged, or it is just the ones that post here?

These days it seems to be most of them.

Note that the original poster stated "... has killed thousands of
innocent
civilians..." without providing some kind of evidence? Since the
unpleasantness in VietNam, IIRC, the USAF has done an admirable job of
avoiding civilian casualties. The recent exercise in Iraq showed beyond
question how precision munitions could limit civilian casualties. To
date,
I've seen no evidence that civilian casualties in Iraq and Afghanistan
number more than a few hundred, if that many.

You must have not been looking then. The death toll has easily crossed
10,000. Western media reported Iraqi civilian casualties alone crossed
thousand dead in the first month of the invasion itself. The US
authority has been careful not to officially keep a count of civilian
casualties in Iraq - unless ofcourse they are "contractors".

Just google 'iraq civilian casualties'. But why bother? They were just
wogs.

Google it and what you find is a whole bunch of unsubstantiated accusations
with little or no proof to back them up.