View Single Post
  #1  
Old July 1st 04, 05:02 PM
Harry Andreas
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article , "Charles Talleyrand"
wrote:

"Harry Andreas" wrote in message

...
If you want to build a modern fighter radar, then AESA is the only way

to go.

There's only 3 companies in the world with the expertise to do an AESA

radar.
2 of them are in the USA, and only one of them has AESA in production.


I'm pretty sure the Russians and the French would disagree with you.


I took the French into account.
The Russians...I'm not sure that what they're building is an AESA.
I could be wrong though.


For Canada to come up to speed with a purely domestic system
would take a minimum of 10 years.


Could you offer some justification for this estimate? I'd be interested

in any
reasoning you might offer.


I takes very specialized knowledge and facilities to build an AESA.
It's a fair bit different than a mechanically scanned array.
Someone with no base in building fighter radars would have to bring
a lot of engineers up to speed, while simultaneously building factories,
foundries,
and test facilities. That takes time.
Other than that I really can't comment on specifics.

--
Harry Andreas
Engineering raconteur