View Single Post
  #3  
Old May 26th 17, 03:26 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Steve Thompson[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 21
Default Reserve altitude

I agree with Evan.

But why not get the guys at LXNav, Naviter,
LXNavigation, to call it arrival "height" and reserve
"height" if you must have it? Which imho is what it is
displayed, and this more precise terminology might
remove at least one source of confusion.

While you're at it, Waypoints have Elevation, perhaps.



At 14:08 26 May 2017, Tango Eight wrote:
On Friday, May 26, 2017 at 8:46:28 AM UTC-4, MNLou

wrote:
Hi Evan -=20
=20
Would you please expand a bit on why you think it is

better to set
reserv=
e altitude to zero?
=20
Thanks!
=20
Lou


Uh, sure. This is a semi-religious issue, so opinions will

vary. Here's
m=
y $0.02 on a rainy day:

Conditions vary. Airport environments vary. I happen

to fly in a region
o=
f the world (Northern New England) that features a lot

of terrain that
runs=
between poorly landable and completely unlandable,

and weather than runs
f=
rom benign to a crash-waiting-to-happen. While my

environment is more
chal=
lenging than many, yours isn't uniform, either.

So, the basic point is: there is no one standard reserve

height that is
app=
ropriate in all situations. You as PIC need to be making

decisions based
o=
n environment, current conditions & anything else that

affects safety of
fl=
ight. The computer is your assistant, not your decision

maker.

For example: At my home airport (also DC's home

airport) our traffic
patter=
n is high due to surrounding terrain and your final glide

ought to be
padde=
d well beyond this because there is simply no safe

place to land other
than=
the airport for a radius of about 5 miles (and then only

one or two
places=
, not necessarily where you want them!). Furthermore,

the "safe" (that
is,=
landable) route into my home airport follows a river

valley which often
fe=
atures a) valley winds and b) subsiding air. I'm usually

looking for
1500'=
over an MC 2.0 (kts) final glide from 25 out, based on

the airport
elevati=
on. When I was learning to fly XC here, it was more

like 2000 over.=20

This is total overkill at a million flat lands airports.=20

The obvious, simple solution is to set your flight

computer to report
estim=
ated arrival height at any destination without any

reserve, then do the
PIC=
decision making thing. For old Cambridge gear, that's

trivial. For
Clear=
Nav, there's one gotcha involved (easily handled, set

the purple amoeba to
=
zero and the red one to 1000 agl), for SN-10, you have

to build yourself a
=
whole new database with fake-news airport elevations

(yes, people really
do=
this, I've watched).

Go fast, make good decisions, land safe!

best,
Evan Ludeman / T8