In message , tw
writes
I've always wondered, what are the differences between the M1, the M1 Garand
and the M14?
M1 rifle was named the Garand: chambered for .30-06 and feeding from an
eight-shot charger.
M14 was very similar, but was chambered in 7.62mm NATO, used a
twenty-round box magazine, and in some versions had a full-auto
capability (little used and often deleted)
Is it just cosmetic stuff like magazine capacity, barrel length
and shape of the stock etc, or is there a big difference in the action?
/*obligatory nationalist point scoring to be taken with pinch of salt*/
Of course, the SLR kicked both their arses, and the Lee-Enfield was better
still! ;-)
Now, for lethality you want a Martini-Henry
--
He thinks too much: such men are dangerous.
Julius Caesar I:2
Paul J. Adam MainBoxatjrwlynch[dot]demon{dot}co(.)uk